Use a general Eval function for expressions in templates. (#23927)
One of the proposals in #23328
This PR introduces a simple expression calculator
(templates/eval/eval.go), it can do basic expression calculations.
Many untested template helper functions like `Mul` `Add` can be replaced
by this new approach.
Then these `Add` / `Mul` / `percentage` / `Subtract` / `DiffStatsWidth`
could all use this `Eval`.
And it provides enhancements for Golang templates, and improves
readability.
Some examples:
----
* Before: `{{Add (Mul $glyph.Row 12) 12}}`
* After: `{{Eval $glyph.Row "*" 12 "+" 12}}`
----
* Before: `{{if lt (Add $i 1) (len $.Topics)}}`
* After: `{{if Eval $i "+" 1 "<" (len $.Topics)}}`
## FAQ
### Why not use an existing expression package?
We need a highly customized expression engine:
* do the calculation on the fly, without pre-compiling
* deal with int/int64/float64 types, to make the result could be used in
Golang template.
* make the syntax could be used in the Golang template directly
* do not introduce too much complex or strange syntax, we just need a
simple calculator.
* it needs to strictly follow Golang template's behavior, for example,
Golang template treats all non-zero values as truth, but many 3rd
packages don't do so.
### What's the benefit?
* Developers don't need to add more `Add`/`Mul`/`Sub`-like functions,
they were getting more and more.
Now, only one `Eval` is enough for all cases.
* The new code reads better than old `{{Add (Mul $glyph.Row 12) 12}}`,
the old one isn't familiar to most procedural programming developers
(eg, the Golang expression syntax).
* The `Eval` is fully covered by tests, many old `Add`/`Mul`-like
functions were never tested.
### The performance?
It doesn't use `reflect`, it doesn't need to parse or compile when used
in Golang template, the performance is as fast as native Go template.
### Is it too complex? Could it be unstable?
The expression calculator program is a common homework for computer
science students, and it's widely used as a teaching and practicing
purpose for developers. The algorithm is pretty well-known.
The behavior can be clearly defined, it is stable.
2023-04-07 22:25:49 +09:00
|
|
|
{{Eval .file.Addition "+" .file.Deletion}}
|
|
|
|
|
<span class="diff-stats-bar gt-mx-3" data-tooltip-content="{{.root.locale.Tr "repo.diff.stats_desc_file" (Eval .file.Addition "+" .file.Deletion) .file.Addition .file.Deletion | Str2html}}">
|
2023-04-08 22:15:22 +09:00
|
|
|
{{/* if the denominator is zero, then the float result is "width: NaNpx", as before, it just works */}}
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="diff-stats-add-bar" style="width: {{Eval 100 "*" .file.Addition "/" "(" .file.Addition "+" .file.Deletion "+" 0.0 ")"}}%"></div>
|
2020-11-16 08:50:06 +09:00
|
|
|
</span>
|
